Max_Fischer

Awesome, thanks. And do you know if Quickness is now used for anything? Or if any of the other attributes have been changed (other than PA and PC)?

Hey goji, I just sent you a PM with a question but then found this thread and realized I should have just posted here. Basically I was wondering about compatibility with TSB Tool Supreme. Tecmonster specifically mentions that using TSB Tool can break some stuff in his 2020 edit, and I was wondering if you knew of anything like that in yours? Also, I am hoping to use this rom as the basis for a drafted COM vs COM league and so I want to make sure we all know what the attributes do exactly. Sorry if this is already documented somewhere. From what I can tell the attributes are the same as in the original game, except for the PA/PC hack (PC is now completion/interception chance, PA is ability to throw on target). Is that it? Is Quickness now used for anything in this version? Thanks a ton, and this version looks super awesome!

Ok thanks. By going back to _0.9.1_Beta I was able to load everything. Looks like it was not only cutting of the 49ers but also the Rams, Seahawks, Cardinals, and the schedule data at the end.

Greetings! Just downloaded this tool, it looks to be very awesome. So a year or two ago I ran an 8-player league using the original rom where we each drafted a full team of 30 and then I used TSB Manager (or whatever the utility is for the 28-team rom) to swap all of our drafted guys together to create the 8 teams. I then used some utility to edit the schedule (may have even been TSBTool Supreme...it's been long enough that I can't remember and I seem to have lost the folder with those files). Recorded the games with OBS, put them on youtube, great times were had by all. Anyway, my buddies want to do another league but to mix things up we want to use the latest 2020 tb.org rom to draft from. Obviously what I used before won't work since this is a 32-team rom, but it looks like Supreme will fit the bill. We aren't fancy with our own helmet designs or anything....really we just need to be able to do 3 things: 1) swap players from team to team. 2) rename the teams. 3) update the schedule. So that is my long unnecessary preamble to a question....when I load the 2020 rom (specifically, Tecmo2020_rev3.nes) into TSBTool Supreme it looks like the 49ers player data at the end is getting chopped. All the teams before that up through Panthers look ok, but here's what I'm seeing for 49ers: TEAM = 49ers SimData=0x89170, PLAYBOOK R4753, P2573 QB1, , Face=0x1e, #0, 25, 69, 13, 13, 56, 50, 44, 44 ,[2, 6, 2 ] QB2, , Face=0x40, #0, 25, 69, 31, 13, 44, 38, 50, 50 ,[5, 6, 1 ] RB1, , Face=0x99, #8e, 38, 69, 44, 25, 69, 31 ,[5, 3, 5, 2 ] RB2, ÿ& ..and then nothing else, that's the end of the data. Have you seen this before?

The site seems to be down again. Any idea if it will be up again soon? I've used it in the past and it is awesome....I was hoping to use it again here soon for another Fantasy Tecmo league I'll be running. Thanks! PS - Does anyone know of another way to quickly pull the season stats from a game? I've searched around (like here for example: www.tecmosb.com) but can't seem to find anything.

NFL: There's not really any teams I hate/dislike, but I dislike the fans of several teams: Cowboys, Eagles, and Steelers being chief among them. TSB: For some reason I've always hated SF in TSB.

I'm (almost) an actuary. I haven't played TSB in too many weird places, but I have played at work (a previous job), and on my laptop whilst on the toilet.

This is awesome. This makes wonder: Does Tecmo erase stats after fumbles in general (not just post-TD fumbles)? I think it does. I guess my question is, is Tecmo's treatment of fumbles and stats in line with the NFL's rules?

Alright, I simmed a full COM vs COM season with this bad-boy while I was sleeping last night. Here's what happened: League Leaders (I'll mostly just list the knobbe users' players) --MtSuperBowl (NYG), Phillyofis (MIA), and Snoopy (BAL) were top 3 in passer rating (187.7, 177.6, and 145.0). --Slimstewie (KC) was 2nd in receiving yards (1341). --Drukenhonk (DAL) was 9th in receiving yards (1239) but 1st in yards per reception (53.8!). --Buck (NYG) was 6th in rushing yards (1143) and 4th in yards per attempt (9.. --Ravensrule (BAL) was tied for 4th in picks (9), including one returned for a TD. --JStout (DAL) and WMoonBomb (HOU) had 7 picks each (tied for 14th), and Bodom (NE) had 6 (tied for 21st). --Drummerfor (CLE) led the league in sacks with 30. --Hurricaine (DAL) was 2nd in sacks with 27. --Yours truly (Robert Fisher, NYG) was tied for 9th in sacks with 20. --Extensive (PHI) was tied for 2nd in average kickoff return (16.6), and was first in total kickoff return yards (1049) and tied for first in kickoff returns for TD (2). Team Stuff Top Pass Offense: Packers Top Rush Offense: Ravens Top Total Offense: Ravens Top Pass Defense: Steelers Top Rush Defense: Jaguars Top Total Defense: Steelers Best record: Steelers (14-2) Worst record: Cardinals (0-15-1) Playoffs Jets, Steelers, Texans, Broncos were the AFC division winners, with Chiefs and Ravens as wild cards. Giants, Lions, Falcons, 49ers, with Cowboys and Vikings as wild cards in the NFC. AFC: Ravens over Broncos, Texans over Chiefs, Jets over Ravens, Steelers over Texans, Jets over Steelers NFC: Cowboys over Falcons, Vikings over 49ers, Giants over Cowboys, Lions over Vikings, Giants over Lions Superbowl: Jets over Giants, final score 14-13 Giants are pretty stacked (V.M.T. Superbowl (QB), Chris Buck (RB), Ray Mobilepro (WR), Robert Fisher (LILB, but actually lineman due to NY's use of 4-3), K.Rodwoodson (RCB)) but it wasn't enough to pull out the victory.

Sweet. Once it's released I think I will sim a full COM vs COM season to see how everybody performs.

When I simmed 100 seasons on SKP (in that thread that Rod linked above), I had SF go 16-0 three times, and Buffalo did it once. I also had one 0-16 team (Atlanta).

Interesting. Looks like Denver has the worst team sim numbers in the AFC West, yet they finished 2nd. Touche.

Ok, here's the last sim stuff I wanted to look at, then I'll let it rest for awhile. I finally finished running and compiling the data from 100 seasons with every team on SKP. All I recorded from each season was the W-L-T record of each team, and if a team made the playoffs, won the division, won the conference, or won the superbowl. So I didn't record any points for or points against data (didn't want to type that much stuff in each time). Here are the final standings in each division, with each team's average won-lost record over the 100 seasons (note: I didn't even bother to list ties since they rounded down to an average of 0 for every team). Also, in parentheses after each team's average W-L record is the maximum # of games they ever won in a season and the minimum # of games they ever won in a season. So for example, Miami's line is "10-6 (14, 5)", which means their average record over all 100 seasons was 10-6. Their best season was 14 wins and their worst season was 5 wins. AFC East ***Buffalo Bills: 12-4 (16, *Miami Dolphins: 10-6 (14, 5) New York Jets: 7-9 (12, 2) Indianapolis Colts: 5-11 (12, 1) New England Patriots: 4-12 (8, 1) AFC Central ***Houston Oilers: 10-6 (15, 4) Cincinnati Bengals: 8-8 (13, 3) Pittsburgh Steelers: 8-8 (12, 4) Cleveland Browns: 5-11 (9, 1) AFC West **Los Angeles Raiders: 10-6 (14, 6) *Denver Broncos: 9-7 (13, 4) *Seattle Seahawks: 8-8 (12, 4) Kansas City Chiefs: 8-8 (13, 3) San Diego Chargers: 7-9 (13, 1) NFC East ***New York Giants: 11-5 (14, 5) *Washington Redskins: 9-7 (15, 4) *Philadelphia Eagles: 9-7 (14, 5) Dallas Cowboys: 8-8 (12, 3) Phoenix Cardinals: 6-10 (11, 1) NFC Central **Chicago Bears: 10-6 (13, 5) *Minnesota Vikings: 9-7 (13, 4) Green Bay Packers: 7-9 (11, 3) Detriot Lions: 6-10 (12, 2) Tampa Bay Buccaneers: 6-10 (10, 1) NFC West ***San Francisco 49ers: 13-3 (16, 10) New Orleans Saints: 8-8 (13, 4) Los Angeles Rams: 7-9 (12, 2) Atlanta Falcons: 5-11 (9, 0) ***: First-round bye **: Division winner w/o first-round bye *: Wild Card spot Notes: --In all 100 seasons, only one team ever went 0-16: Atlanta (and they only did it once). --Only two teams ever went 16-0: Buffalo (did it once) and San Francisco (did it three times). --Only two teams never had a losing record in all 100 season: SF's worst was 10-6 and BUF's worst was 8-8. --New England was the only team to never achieve a better than .500 record; their best season was 8-8. --San Francisco had the lowest standard deviation of wins at 1.42 (so you could say they had the most "consistent performance from season to season). --Kansas City had the highest standard deviation of wins at 2.17 (so you could say they had the most "volatile" performance from season to season). The following lists show the number of times each team achieved a given post-season mark: Number of times making the playoffs (as division winner OR wild card) San Francisco: 100 Buffalo: 99 New York Giants: 95 Houston: 87 Miami: 85 Chicago: 70 Los Angeles Raiders: 70 Minnesota: 67 Washington: 66 Denver: 54 Cincinnati: 50 Philadelphia: 50 Seattle: 50 New Orleans: 46 Kansas City: 41 Dallas: 34 Pittsburgh: 30 Green Bay: 28 Los Angeles Rams: 18 Detriot: 15 San Diego: 15 New York Jets: 12 Phoenix: 7 Indianapolis: 5 Tampa Bay: 4 Cleveland: 2 Atlanta: 0 New England: 0 Number of times as division champ AFC East BUF: 79 MIA: 20 JET: 1 IND: 0 NE: 0 AFC Central HOU: 68 CIN: 21 PIT: 10 CLE: 1 AFC West DEN: 33 RAI: 32 SEA: 20 KC: 11 SD: 4 NFC East GIA: 62 WAS: 27 PHI: 6 PHX: 3 DAL: 2 NFC Central CHI: 49 MIN: 37 GB: 10 DET: 2 TB: 2 NFC West SF: 98 NO: 1 RAM: 1 ATL: 0 Note: The AFC West is the only instance where the team with the best average record did not win the division the most. The Raiders averaged 10 wins to Denver's 9, yet Denver won the division 33 times to Los Angeles' 32. Number of times as conference champ AFC BUF: 38 HOU: 24 RAI: 11 MIA: 8 DEN: 6 SEA: 6 CIN: 5 KC: 1 PIT: 1 CLE, IND, JET, NE, and SD never won the AFC championship. NFC SF: 59 GIA: 18 CHI: 7 PHI: 6 MIN: 4 WAS: 4 DAL: 1 NO: 1 ATL, DET, GB, PHX, RAM, and TB never won the NFC championship. Number of times as Superbowl champ SF: 45 BUF: 16 GIA: 10 HOU: 10 RAI: 5 SEA: 3 CIN: 2 DEN: 2 PHI: 2 WAS: 2 CHI: 1 KC: 1 MIA: 1 Everyone else: 0

I wonder what's the most points somebody could score in a game of Tecmo using save-state abuse. I know it goes against the spirit, but I'm sure you're all familiar with Tool-Assisted Speedruns, where you use save-states and other emulator features such as slow-down to completely beat the sh*t out of a game? So I wonder, could somebody theoretically put up 200 pts in a TSB game using such tools? At some point there's an upper limit that's impossible to reach even with save-states (like 1000 pts), but what is that limit?

Awesome idea. Glad I made it in before the cut-off. Name: Well my first name is Robert, so technically it would be "Robert Max_Fischer". That sounds kinda weird so you could also go with just "Max Fischer" or "Robert Fischer" (Bobby Fischer!), your call. Team: Giants Jersey #: 98 Position: LILB (Move over, Gary Reasons) Face #: 0x40 All I humbly ask is to have LT-like stats.....maybe bumped up a notch in each category.