Jump to content

chekreyes

TTL Member
  • Posts

    1,107
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Upvote
    chekreyes reacted to Knobbe in Buck VS Chekreyes - The Ratings Showdown   
    And we're done.

  2. Upvote
    chekreyes reacted to DrunkenGamer in Buck VS Chekreyes - The Ratings Showdown   
    You should walk away faster... fuckface!
  3. Upvote
    chekreyes got a reaction from Slippery Nips in Buck VS Chekreyes - The Ratings Showdown   
    Did I mention that I like this rom? Why are we carrying on and on with this?
  4. Upvote
    chekreyes got a reaction from GameplayLoop in Buck VS Chekreyes - The Ratings Showdown   
    Cool story, Maynard.

    Of course, Kamp!
  5. Upvote
    chekreyes got a reaction from kamphuna8 in Buck VS Chekreyes - The Ratings Showdown   
    Cool story, Maynard.

    Of course, Kamp!
  6. Downvote
    chekreyes got a reaction from Knobbe in Buck VS Chekreyes - The Ratings Showdown   
    No, Knobbe. I wasn't looking to be misquoted, misrepresented as starting my own thread to attack buck, nor to create a Chek vs *anybody* battle. Once again, that is absolutely drama and theatrics that you created, not I. And Maynard, I was doing nothing differently than anybody else was, and it absolutely was productive. It let the people see what the Rom was about/based on, which was previously unclear. The situation took a wrong turn only when it went the direction of who would beat who in the game, which was a misunderstanding of which you'll notice that Buck and I got past on our own, and without the help of you two TecmoBook mediators and your lectures. Your involvement and words in things like this is laughable. We're grown men, We'll get through it. Save the lectures for your kids.

     

    Yes Knobbe, you are the asshole. What are you supposed to do? How about just shut the fuck up, get off my jock, and mind your own business for once, especially when the situation had already diffused itself? Nobody was burning your precious site down. You didn't have to say or do anything. Me and buck are fine, we were civil, and you stirred shit back up again. You're the one turning a topic into a pile of shit now. We were beginning to talk about a new project, and you derailed it. And in doing so, you brought up something that has absolutely nothing to do with this (my alleged league reputation). And you were way off the mark in doing so. I get along with many, many more people than I don't. The people that I get along with simply don't play your little forum games with your up ones, polls, and all of the other lame ass and girly shit that your site breeds. You only hear from the other tools like yourself that are way too proud of their involvement in a friggin 8 bit video game. And i'm not on thin ice nor threatening to quit in any leagues. None. Zero. So, yes. You are the asshole, you are the drama queen.

     

    You know me, or at least you think you do. Did you really think that I wouldn't respond to your garble? Of course you knew that I would. That's why you did it. You want the drama, but then you chastise when you get it. If you weren't about the drama, you'd stay out of it just like everybody else that is not into the drama does. Who do you think you are kidding?

  7. Downvote
    chekreyes got a reaction from Knobbe in Buck VS Chekreyes - The Ratings Showdown   
    The effect of coming off as a total tool? Just relax a little brother. Life is too short.

    So you wanted to mirror the original version. Kaepernick is QB Eagles, Peterson is Bo, Megatron is Rice, etc, etc? I get it now, and I love it. I actually started a rom exactly as such, and never finished. I had RG3 as QB Eagles though. I think Wilson was Testeverde and Kaepernick was maybe Majkowski. Cutler was Elway, Weeden was BJ Tolliver, etc, etc. I forget who I was using for Freeman. Maybe Steve Young, which yes, would be a little too good for him.

    Did you do this exactly, or did you just loosely base it on this concept?
  8. Upvote
    chekreyes got a reaction from Knobbe in Buck VS Chekreyes - The Ratings Showdown   
    I didn't say it wasn't worthwhile. I said the way you talk about a video game message board as a "community", along with your philosophies on etiquette and such within, screams total dork. I said such after you critiqued the way I spoke.

  9. Downvote
    chekreyes got a reaction from Knobbe in Buck VS Chekreyes - The Ratings Showdown   
    Dork

     

    It's a fuckin video game message board geeks!!

  10. Downvote
    chekreyes got a reaction from bob sacamano in Buck VS Chekreyes - The Ratings Showdown   
    I didn't say it wasn't worthwhile. I said the way you talk about a video game message board as a "community", along with your philosophies on etiquette and such within, screams total dork. I said such after you critiqued the way I spoke.

  11. Upvote
    chekreyes reacted to bgboud2 in Buck VS Chekreyes - The Ratings Showdown   
    This can only be settled in Knobbe`s basement
  12. Downvote
    chekreyes got a reaction from GameplayLoop in Buck VS Chekreyes - The Ratings Showdown   
    Dork

     

    It's a fuckin video game message board geeks!!

  13. Downvote
    chekreyes got a reaction from bob sacamano in Buck VS Chekreyes - The Ratings Showdown   
    Dork

     

    It's a fuckin video game message board geeks!!

  14. Upvote
    chekreyes reacted to SirTed in Buck VS Chekreyes - The Ratings Showdown   
    Personally,

     

    I liked it better when I thought you and buck were pissed. I had hope for a second we'd get a sweet TSB '14 showdown between the Bucs and Bengals for all of us to see (streamed). This getting along thing is bullshit. What better way to kick off a launch?

  15. Downvote
    chekreyes reacted to Knobbe in Buck VS Chekreyes - The Ratings Showdown   
    What you say and what you do are two completely different things...such as complaining about "tborg" drama while being the cause of it.

    Abusing mod powers?  I posted what we're looking for in this thread which is for you to say your piece and then either it's implemented or not.  What are we supposed to do?  Watch as you torpedo yet another topic because you have to be right about everything and you have to have the last word or else.  I mean, if Chekreyes can't take a civil 20 post topic and turn it into a steaming pile of shit, then I'm the asshole, right?

     

    Being a "good owner" in the sense that you get your games in will get you a ways in the online leagues.

    The fact that you're such an awful person to deal with is why you're constantly being kicked out/blacked balled out/telling people you quit leagues.

  16. Upvote
    chekreyes got a reaction from Slippery Nips in Buck VS Chekreyes - The Ratings Showdown   
    Ugh. Typical tborg Tecmobook drama, and people getting their panties all in a bunch.  I made no such topic. Somebody is abusing mod powers. This is all pulled for the tborg14 rom release thread. I was simply confused as to why players were rated the way they were, and why later I was told by the creator of the game that the Bengals with 50ms RBs were made to pound the rock in route to victory over the Bucs top ranked run defense. Freeman was also made with a measly 25pc. Yes, he does suck, but not that badly. And guys like Andy Dalton have 50pc with just one less INT. A very good Bucs offensive line was also made to be terrible on this game. This all just made no sense to me. Buck clarified a lot of it before a very civil conversation suddenly turned extremely anti-Buccaneers.

     

    Outside of this and a couple of other strange numbers,  I said it was a great rom, for crying out loud.

  17. Upvote
    chekreyes got a reaction from rmm1976 in Buck VS Chekreyes - The Ratings Showdown   
    Well, buck. I'm not sure you wanted to go there. I'd take the Bucs and just pound the rock to victory, which is exactly what the real Bucs would not be able to do against the very stout Cincy front seven. They'd have a little more pass orientated attack. So our game wouldn't depict real life whatsoever. I get you though on wanting to keep good teams good and bad teams bad though, and how some times you have to dock guys for that purpose. I just think you made it too extreme on some guys. And it looks like I'm not alone on that.
  18. Upvote
    chekreyes got a reaction from bradbears81 in Fairfield, OH - 07/27/13 - 2013 Midwest Tecmo Super Bowl Tournament   
    Wow. Fulcher really played, and with the Bengals? Did he use himself every play? Lol. That is indeed awesome!
  19. Upvote
    chekreyes reacted to joeygats in Defending the motion Run 2   
    be like the honey in the flower and let the bee come to you

  20. Upvote
    chekreyes got a reaction from segathonsov in Running at DB 3   
    50ms is generally seen as the threshold for effective running. Some can do 44ms though, especially if they are good tappers. A good DB3, controlled by a good player, is hard to run on with any play and with any back though. most consider it the best man control position on the field.

×
×
  • Create New...