kevincabarello

Just want to thank UltimateWeapon for putting together another great tournament this past Saturday. Congrats to Matt Vogt for winning the tournament; the final four consisted of three GREAT games. The Pro Bowl Final Four ended up being a very great addition to the tournament, and made for a lot of exciting action to watch for those unlucky and not skilled enough to advance to that stage. Ryan, we'll have to play again. I need to redeem myself after that SD-DAL match. I'm sure you'll have a thread up regarding what date the first "bi-monthly meet up" will be.

Sounds fine. I was just curious since there are some passing plays that it would be nice to have a WR at the "RB2" position. Just seeing if you could be restricted to 7 plays and just not be "allowed" to pick a non-reverse play with a WR's name listed.

Would it be acceptable to put a WR/TE at the RB position, and just not be allowed to pick the running plays that they appear in? For example, Can Art Monk be placed in the WR1 slot for the Redskins, have a running play that has Art Monk running the ball, and simply be restricted from using the play? In other words, only being allowed to use three (two; one) running plays? Suppose the play is accidentally picked. Would the ruling be a mutual agreement between players to just let the offensive team run out of bounds for zero/negative yardage, essentially being a loss of down? Just some random thoughts...