buck Posted February 4, 2008 Author Share Posted February 4, 2008 commentators also mentioned that welker was nfl leader in YAC.so, fuck all the welker haters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BO FB Offtackle Left Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 commentators also mentioned that welker was nfl leader in YAC.so, fuck all the welker haters.Don't all you stupid Pats fans realize it's only because Moss and Stallworth are always double-teamed? It's easy for a WR to put up sick numbers when all you have to worry about are slow-ass LBs in single coverage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bodom Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 commentators also mentioned that welker was nfl leader in YAC.so, fuck all the welker haters. Don't all you stupid Pats fans realize it's only because Moss and Stallworth are always double-teamed? It's easy for a WR to put up sick numbers when all you have to worry about are slow-ass LBs in single coverage. Who was the 3rd WR on the 49ers with Rice and Taylor? Who is the 3rd WR on the Bengals that put up sick numbers because Johnson and Housh were covered? By the way, don't call me stupid, it hurts my feelings... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BO FB Offtackle Left Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 49ers had Brent Jones. The Bengals suck so it's not a valid comparison. Pats have better play-calling.Edit: also, I don't mean to say Welker is a bad receiver. He's very good at what he does. But he does not have the skills to be a number one option and go head-to-head with the premier CBs in the league. That is what you should consider when rating receivers for a rom. He should not be beating corners with his speed down the sideline, he's not that type of player. So you give him low speed and around 63rec in a 3-wr set and you leave it to the person playing to use him effectively. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buck Posted February 5, 2008 Author Share Posted February 5, 2008 Edit: also, I don't mean to say Welker is a bad receiver. He's very good at what he does. But he does not have the skills to be a number one option and go head-to-head with the premier CBs in the league. That is what you should consider when rating receivers for a rom. He should not be beating corners with his speed down the sideline, he's not that type of player. So you give him low speed and around 63rec in a 3-wr set and you leave it to the person playing to use him effectively.I'll buy that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bruddog Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 There isn't really a way to use him in tecmo like the patriots use him but he shouldn't be that fast. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomTupa Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 commentators also mentioned that welker was nfl leader in YAC.so, fuck all the welker haters. Don't all you stupid Pats fans realize it's only because Moss and Stallworth are always double-teamed? It's easy for a WR to put up sick numbers when all you have to worry about are slow-ass LBs in single coverage. Who was the 3rd WR on the 49ers with Rice and Taylor? Who is the 3rd WR on the Bengals that put up sick numbers because Johnson and Housh were covered? By the way, don't call me stupid, it hurts my feelings... Yeah Jones for the Niners and Henry for the Bengals. Chris Henry put up 6 tds as a rookie then had over 600 yards and 9 tds in 2006. Last year they all sucked. How about Curtis Duncan in TSB, he had 66 catches for 785 yards in 1990 as the 4th reciever Hey I have to give Welker props for his hands and quickness though after hauling in some of Brady's erratic and off stride throws. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bodom Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 81ms/88rec Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoQStar Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 Because I'm an old school Tecmo fan.. when Bo Jackson was at it, he had a 75ms on average. Barry a 6ms. Since Moss has another gear, I'm thinking he should be a 75ms and his hands a 81rec like Rice back on the original Nintendo version.I notice Champ is the best corner. Ladanian is the fastest Rb and Ed Reed is tied for the hardest hitter. He should be a 56/63hp I think.Jacobs from NYG is too, "physical." 94hp on average?Adrian Peterson could be a bit better. ROY plus he's a beast.Also the LB Willis from S.F. Def. ROyWhere is Antonio Cromartie for the Chargers?? And Chris Henry for the Bengals??And T.O. is the only physical Wr when Steve Smith's hitting power and rushing power should be a bit higher. Also Greg Jennings' from the Packers. Great after the catch and you don't want those scrub db's being able to touch 'em, make them fall.P.S. Please, remove Sean Taylor. I love how he's still there but.. you know. Sigh.I'm a stickler for details etc and wouldn't mind giving my input if wanted.[[Trying to use the TSBtool editor to change soem ratings. Any help would be welcomed. Not to be overlooked, great job on the game guys.. =]] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Brady Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 I deserve max stats thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarioFanDan Posted September 12, 2008 Share Posted September 12, 2008 Is out for season an option for Tom Brady? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.