buck Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 I'd just like to see what you guys think about rating Tom Brady for a ROM (50 TD, 6 INTs)Of course, the REC of his receivers will play a roll, so how about those too?Brady: 63PS, 81PCMoss: 44,69,63 75RECWelker: 38,69,50 75RECwould be my initial attempt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomTupa Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 As much as I dislike the guy, I'd give Moss a 69 MS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edisaurusrex Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 Since this is based on stats, I like your ratings except for the Welker 50 MS, 75 rec. I'd up the MS to 56 and lower his rec to 69. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaciremaDream Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 ---Champion Ratings- QB1, tom BRADY, Face=0x3, #12, 25, 69, 19, 13, 56, 88, 81, 75 ,[3, 15, 2 ]WR1, randy MOSS, Face=0x9e, #81, 44, 69, 63, 13, 69, 63 ,[6, 14, 9, 6 ]WR2, wes WELKER, Face=0x29, #87, 44, 69, 44, 13, 63, 63 ,[4, 11, 10, 5 ]--2007-Season--QB1, tom BRADY, Face=0x3, #12, 25, 69, 19, 13, 56, 81, 75, 75 ,[3, 15, 2 ]WR1, randy MOSS, Face=0x9e, #81, 38, 69, 69, 13, 69, 63 ,[6, 14, 9, 6 ]WR2, wes WELKER, Face=0x29, #87, 44, 69, 50, 13, 63, 69 ,[4, 11, 10, 5 ]63ms-69ms can work for moss .. depends on the creators rating system Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BO FB Offtackle Left Posted January 12, 2008 Share Posted January 12, 2008 I always thought of Brady as having QB Bills ratings - 56/81/81/81. Manning has a slightly stronger arm so he gets 63/81/75/75.NO way either one should have 19ms. I considered giving them 6ms because neither one moves much, but the standard 13 is ok.Moss 44/63, 81rec.Welker is a slot receiver who averaged only 10.5 y/r this year. 38/44, 69rec. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomTupa Posted January 12, 2008 Share Posted January 12, 2008 Bo wins. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buck Posted January 12, 2008 Author Share Posted January 12, 2008 ...good point about Welker. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EdibleAntiPerspirant Posted January 12, 2008 Share Posted January 12, 2008 Original style:Brady 75 ps, 81 pcMoss 63 ms, 75 reWelker 44 ms, 81 reDefense-oriented style:Brady 69 ps, 69 pcMoss 56 ms, 69 reWelker 31 ms, 75 re (only 10.5 ypr)Keep in mind that I'm basically pulling this out of my ass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buck Posted January 12, 2008 Author Share Posted January 12, 2008 Original style:Brady 75 ps, 81 pcMoss 63 ms, 75 reWelker 44 ms, 81 reThis is exactly what I had decided on and after play testing it last night, works good. My friend, using Brady, was intercepted twice in one game! (dumbass throwing to maroney) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
suprmnxxx Posted January 13, 2008 Share Posted January 13, 2008 on my new posted rom tsb2k7-32-team-superjuice-v2.1.nes the ratings are.brady rs=25 rp=69 ms=13 hp=13 ps=75 pc=69 ap=69 apb=69moss rs=44 rp=69 ms=69 hp=13 bc=81 rec=75welker rs=44 rp=69 ms=50 hp=19 bc=50 rec=75 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingsoby1 Posted January 14, 2008 Share Posted January 14, 2008 holy shit, you didn't obnoxiously put "sup" at the end of your post. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gripsmoke Posted January 28, 2008 Share Posted January 28, 2008 Since this is based on stats, I like your ratings except for the Welker 50 MS, 75 rec. I'd up the MS to 56 and lower his rec to 69.Wes Welker is a product of the system. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bruddog Posted January 28, 2008 Share Posted January 28, 2008 Brady had 8ints this season last time I checked. 81pc is really insane on the original rom especially if you have good wr's to go with it. So 2004 manning and 2007 brady would qualify. Moss jerry like numbersWelker 44 75 (true he may be faster than that but his role was as the underneath wr) Stallworth 63ms 44recSomething along those line seems right. Stallworth pretty much runs go routes and doesn't have the best hands. Welker runs the underneath stuff. Randy is well pretty much god like.In fact Randy may put Jerry Rice's TD record in danger if he has a few more seasons like this one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomTupa Posted January 28, 2008 Share Posted January 28, 2008 In fact Randy may put Jerry Rice's TD record in danger if he has a few more seasons like this one.And he doesn't even care. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bodom Posted January 28, 2008 Share Posted January 28, 2008 Since this is based on stats, I like your ratings except for the Welker 50 MS, 75 rec. I'd up the MS to 56 and lower his rec to 69.Wes Welker is a product of the system.I know I must sound like a broken record, I keep defending the Patriots time and time again, but I have to disagree with this. Even before Welker came to New England he led Miami in receptions in 2006 (67 rec 687 yds) and also handled most if not all of their kickoff and punt returns. Plus he filled in for Mare and converted an XP and a FG last year. The only reason I know this is because it came against the Patriots. No doubt the guy is a tremendous athlete. And the Pats must have seen something in him to trade away 2nd and 7th round draft picks for him. This year he tied for the NFL lead in receptions with 112 for 1175 yards with 8 TDs, which is impressive seeing as Brady spread the ball around to Moss, Stallworth, Gaffney, Watson, Maroney, Faulk, Morris...and Vrabel. I know the argument could be made that the defense is too concentrated on Randy Moss blah blah blah and that is definitely a factor, but the guy has great hands (the only drop I can recall is a few weeks ago vs. Jacksonville) and what he does after catching the ball is pretty impressive...he also throws one hell of a block - something you don't see on the stat sheet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomTupa Posted January 28, 2008 Share Posted January 28, 2008 Two things. 1. Lots of slow unathletic players have been known to return kicks and punts because of hands2. Mike Furrey had almost 100 catches last year, it doesn't mean he wasn't a product of the system Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bodom Posted January 28, 2008 Share Posted January 28, 2008 Does it mean Furrey was a product of the system or did he capitalize on the chance he was given? You can make that case for any WR. Is Houshmandzadeh a product of the system? Cincinnati is a pass heavy offense and like Welker, has a #1 WR to take most of the focus off of him, but I still think he's a great receiver.Welker isn't slow...he's pretty damn agile. This will be the 2nd year he has led his team in receptions...2 different teams. I think he will continue to be a great receiver for a few years with NE or another team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomTupa Posted January 28, 2008 Share Posted January 28, 2008 http://chicagosports.chicagotribune.com ... 830.column Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bodom Posted January 28, 2008 Share Posted January 28, 2008 >http://chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/cs-080122rick_morrissey_tom_brady_man_crush,1,3705830.columnThat article just described 75% of men in New England...that's hilarious! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaciremaDream Posted February 1, 2008 Share Posted February 1, 2008 One thing I noticed is Wes Welker doesn't waste body movements ...It seems to make up for his lack of 'jukes' or 'agility' and makes it terribly hard to tell where hes going since he can switch direction so well (superb footwork) ..... he seems not to change speed while turning .. (small strides ??) then, his deceptive north-south speed (but not east-west) kills em when they try to recover... +10 YAC off a +5 hitch or out.. cause the defender prolly thoguht he had a step on Wes anyway ... Its gotta be amusing to hear some of the defensive huddles while playing against the patriots..... lotta foul language i can imagine.... lolololol just my two cents,Nacirema Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomTupa Posted February 1, 2008 Share Posted February 1, 2008 If Welker had 10+ YAC on 5 yard hitches, I suppose he averaged -5 YPC on all other pass plays? The guy only averaged 10.5 YPC. I mean really, the Pats went undefeated and broke records, but Pats fans still have to gush about imaginary super abilities of their stars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatmatt Posted February 1, 2008 Share Posted February 1, 2008 nah, there's no super abilities I wish there were though, thatd be great...they could go undefeated every season Anyways, the season isn't done yet, there is one more game to go and I for one, am not looking ahead of the bowl. We need to win Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bodom Posted February 1, 2008 Share Posted February 1, 2008 Wes Welker can be related to when Mario gets the star and starts blinking white and yellow and becomes invincible... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bodom Posted February 1, 2008 Share Posted February 1, 2008 If Welker had 10+ YAC on 5 yard hitches, I suppose he averaged -5 YPC on all other pass plays?If the average is 10, wouldn't it be 5 YPC on all other pass plays, not -5? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bodom Posted February 4, 2008 Share Posted February 4, 2008 Welker ties Super Bowl record with 11 catches...122 yards. Guy needs some respect. He's up there with Rice, Branch and Ross (RIP). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.