Eamon Posted February 13, 2007 Share Posted February 13, 2007 Who's the better QB for PIT?I say Strom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bruddog Posted February 13, 2007 Share Posted February 13, 2007 Both have their uses. Bubby's high PS can be useful for hitting wide open guys. But for lob balls throwing into coverage you want the strominator in there. I like starting off with bubby and trying to hit open guys and then witching to strom if that doesn't work. Throwing into coverage with bubby is not recommended. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eamon Posted February 14, 2007 Author Share Posted February 14, 2007 I usually start out with Strom as he is more accurate. It also depends who is in better physical condition later in the game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capnjiffy Posted February 14, 2007 Share Posted February 14, 2007 I usually just punt and leave it up to Rod Woodson to score Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BO FB Offtackle Left Posted February 14, 2007 Share Posted February 14, 2007 same condition I use Strom, if Bubby is one condition better I use him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danfritsch Posted February 14, 2007 Share Posted February 14, 2007 Brister with 75 PS can pick apart the secondary if you are careful with him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Moon Rison Posted February 15, 2007 Share Posted February 15, 2007 Brister 92% of the time. I don't like slow armed QBs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bruddog Posted February 15, 2007 Share Posted February 15, 2007 Ya Favre was awesome in ATA. Fast PS, low PC qb's work better if there is a reasonable running attack as a threat. Otherwise they kinda suck. Brister 92% of the time. I don't like slow armed QBs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
malferds Posted February 15, 2007 Share Posted February 15, 2007 http://snapshot.compete.com/knobbe.org+ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Moon Rison Posted February 15, 2007 Share Posted February 15, 2007 Ya Favre was awesome in ATA. Fast PS, low PC qb's work better if there is a reasonable running attack as a threat. Otherwise they kinda suck. Brister 92% of the time. I don't like slow armed QBs.Good point. I've learned that you need a decent running game for a high PS QB to be effective. Yet I still manage to do well with Brister and the slow Pitt running game. To be fair, the defenders on the ATA rom were overall better than the original. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bruddog Posted February 15, 2007 Share Posted February 15, 2007 Wow, that was random...>http://snapshot.compete.com/knobbe.org+ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ApolloSpeed Posted February 15, 2007 Share Posted February 15, 2007 ATA ??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bruddog Posted February 15, 2007 Share Posted February 15, 2007 One of the online leagues... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingsoby1 Posted February 15, 2007 Share Posted February 15, 2007 *Agrarian Tourniquet Association Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mi64 Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 I use PIT a lot. I ALWAYS use Strom. I can usually clean house with him, whereas every-other Brister throw is a potential pick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ihoagied Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 stroms higher pc doesnt mean shit with pittsburghs shitty receivers.. bristers clearly the better option Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bruddog Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 It depends on the game situation and defense you are facing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
malferds Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 if there were faster receivers i might consider benching brister Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ihoagied Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 that doesnt make any sense Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.