Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Eamon

Bubby Brister vs. Rick Strom

Who do you prefer?  

20 members have voted

  1. 1. Who do you prefer?

    • Brister
      11
    • Strom
      9


Recommended Posts

Both have their uses. Bubby's high PS can be useful for hitting wide open guys. But for lob balls throwing into coverage you want the strominator in there.

I like starting off with bubby and trying to hit open guys and then witching to strom if that doesn't work. Throwing into coverage with bubby is not recommended.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ya Favre was awesome in ATA. Fast PS, low PC qb's work better if there is a reasonable running attack as a threat. Otherwise they kinda suck.

Brister 92% of the time. I don't like slow

armed QBs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ya Favre was awesome in ATA. Fast PS, low PC qb's work better if there is a reasonable running attack as a threat. Otherwise they kinda suck.

Brister 92% of the time. I don't like slow

armed QBs.

Good point. I've learned that you need a decent running game for a high PS QB to be effective. Yet I still manage to do well with Brister and the slow Pitt running game. To be fair, the defenders on the ATA rom were overall better than the original.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...