Gary Reasons Posted October 31, 2006 Share Posted October 31, 2006 Im in a group of 6 that has an annual tournament. This year we were gonna use the 6 worst teams in the game (Not including Tampa Bay), any thoughts?1. Colts2. Patriots3. Cardinals4. Seahawks5. Browns?6. ???? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Moon Rison Posted October 31, 2006 Share Posted October 31, 2006 Mine are:1) IND2) NE3) CLE4) GB5) SEA6) ATLATL is probably better than NO, but I've noticed that I suck for some reason when I use ATL and I do substantially better with NO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knobbe Posted October 31, 2006 Share Posted October 31, 2006 Atlanta has an elite type DB in Deion and elite WR in Rison. New Orleans has no stars on either side of the ball. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brakos81 Posted October 31, 2006 Share Posted October 31, 2006 Whichever teams have been good the last couple years usually sucked 15 years ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slig Posted November 1, 2006 Share Posted November 1, 2006 my bottom tier:INDSEANEthen:GBCLENOPHX is close behind at #7. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stadawim Posted November 1, 2006 Share Posted November 1, 2006 1 - Colts2 - Patriots3 - Seahawks4 - Packers5 - (why can't i put Tampa again?)Browns6 - RamsNew Orleans has no stars on either side of the ball.Ah yes, but they have kick returners. And why i typed it that way is because it seems no matter who you put in, they will get you a score every game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Moon Rison Posted November 1, 2006 Share Posted November 1, 2006 Rams have no defense, sure. But that's a little harsh. Jim Everett (63 PC) with those kinds of receivers. That's practically guaranteeing at least 3 scores. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BO FB Offtackle Left Posted November 1, 2006 Share Posted November 1, 2006 I think the majority would agree that the bottom five, in no particular order, are the Colts, Pats, Browns, Seahawks, and 'Aints. For me the sixth worst team comes down to the Pack or the Cards. If you are allowed to use Nelson (without diving, of course) then the Cards are worse. If Nelson is verboten, then the Pack is worse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NinjaTheGaiden Posted November 4, 2006 Share Posted November 4, 2006 My list:Worst to better1. Indy2. Patriots3. Settale4. Dallas5. .......... After this I don't think anyone can beat me if I have any other team Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panzeh Posted November 5, 2006 Share Posted November 5, 2006 Doesn't Seattle have a decent QB in Dave Krieg? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knobbe Posted November 5, 2006 Share Posted November 5, 2006 Yes, but it's the only thing going for them and he has some flaws. I believe Krieg has 6 ms and 25 passing speed to go with his high Pass Control rating which means every pass is lollipoped. Otherwise no one else on the offense or defensive side is better which makes them worse than the Browns.Doesn't Seattle have a decent QB in Dave Krieg? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bruddog Posted November 5, 2006 Share Posted November 5, 2006 Actually seatlle has DL jacob green 38rs 50rp 63ms and two of the dbs have 44rp and 56msSo the defense is about on the same level as cleveland. Krieg is 13ms so he's not super slow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingsoby1 Posted November 5, 2006 Share Posted November 5, 2006 ColtsPatsSeattleBrownsPackSaints are better than all those teamsCards are a mid tier team... one of the fastest DBs + a good offense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knobbe Posted November 5, 2006 Share Posted November 5, 2006 Apparently I have Tecmo Super Fuzzy MemoryActually seatlle has DL jacob green 38rs 50rp 63ms and two of the dbs have 44rp and 56msSo the defense is about on the same level as cleveland. Krieg is 13ms so he's not super slow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
looked Posted November 6, 2006 Share Posted November 6, 2006 1. Patriots2. Colts3. Seattle4. JetsBut maybe I just hate the Jets. All other teams are usable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BO FB Offtackle Left Posted November 6, 2006 Share Posted November 6, 2006 1. Patriots2. Colts3. Seattle4. JetsBut maybe I just hate the Jets. All other teams are usable.You can't pick the Jets. They have a 69 REC WR, 44 MS backs, a 50/56 QB, and a very good defense - Byrd is tied with Jerome Brown and Keith Millard as the best RILBs in the game, and that is the most important LB position. You have a clear shot at the QB on every play. Plus FS McMillan is 38/44/56/56 with 63 INTs if you start getting burned at the line. Not too shabby. The Cards, Packers, and 'Aints have nowhere close to that kind of D. The Cards have better RBs and better receivers, but a worse QB and a worse D. The Pack is maybe slightly better overall on O, but a bad D. The 'Aints are worse than the Jets on both sides of the ball. Only thing they have going for them is Heyward on KRs. I don't know, maybe I just love blitzing too much.As for the Seahawks, they have no defensive player over 38 RP or 50 INT, other than Green, and since everyone says no using DL, their D becomes entirely worthless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bruddog Posted November 6, 2006 Share Posted November 6, 2006 I think DL use is fine as long as your not diving right after the snap. Thats the main issue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
girabbit Posted November 6, 2006 Share Posted November 6, 2006 Instead of the worst 6 teams in Tecmo, maybe you should reconsider to 6 bad teams in Tecmo who aren't Indy or NE. Cards, Hawks, Browns, Aints, Pack and Falcons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingsoby1 Posted November 7, 2006 Share Posted November 7, 2006 Seahawks, Browns, Packers are clearly the second tier of suck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metcalf up the middle Posted November 10, 2006 Share Posted November 10, 2006 yeah, first of all the Browns are not one of the 6 worst teams, Id say in the worst top 10 but not 6. And, how about the Packers or the saints, Atlanta isn't all that great either. and how many times do you need to see Rodney Pete run that sneak play? Yes the lions suck too, even with Barry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knobbe Posted November 10, 2006 Share Posted November 10, 2006 The browns are the Patriots with a QB and a slightly crappier defense.yeah, first of all the Browns are not one of the 6 worst teams, Id say in the worst top 10 but not 6. And, how about the Packers or the saints, Atlanta isn't all that great either. and how many times do you need to see Rodney Pete run that sneak play? Yes the lions suck too, even with Barry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capt.jack Posted November 18, 2006 Share Posted November 18, 2006 well there are some bad teams in tecmo but i dont see seattle being one of them or atlanta 1.new england 2.cleveland 3.green bay 4.indianapolis 5.phoenix 6.tampa baythose would be my six. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EdibleAntiPerspirant Posted November 18, 2006 Share Posted November 18, 2006 Why do so many people think Tampa Bay sucks? They're average at worst. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danfritsch Posted November 18, 2006 Share Posted November 18, 2006 I was wondering the same thing about TB. It is amazing to see what people think of them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LouisOliver Posted November 18, 2006 Share Posted November 18, 2006 Their offense is just awful. With their line and Vinny's pass speed, they can't throw the ball. In my experience, scrambling isn't too effective when there isn't a real threat to throw. Anderson is decent, but you'd need something more than 50 MS to make this offense work. The defense is ok but Haddix can be neutralized by running at him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.