I was wondering if you had set up a rankings system for posts in this forum. Sort of how there is karma in Gamefaqs and gamer and super gamer in the Tecmo Inc. forum. If so, then what are the rankings and how many posts does it take to acheive each ranking?
Rankings?
Started By
Slig
, Apr 26 2002 06:39 PM
9 replies to this topic
#2
Knobbe
-
- Founder
-
- 13,263 posts
Godfather of Tecmo
- Blog Entries: 13
Posted 26 April 2002 - 08:43 PM
0-34 Water Boy
35-99 Promising Rookie
100-249 Starter
249-500 Veteran
500-999 Tecmo Super Champion
1000+ Tecmo Legend
2013 Nebraska: Final 4
2012 TomzcakV: Round of 32
2012 Madison: Round of 32
2012 Nebraska: Round of 16
2011 Nebraska: Final 4
2011 Madison: Round of 32
2010 Chicago: Round of 32
2010 Madison: Round of 32
#3
J-Diddy
-
- Members
-
- 5,250 posts
Tecmo Fanatic
Posted 08 December 2002 - 03:50 PM
Maybe we should get a few in there between Tecmo Super Champion and Legend.
like
500-600 Bob Nelson
601-800 Wayne Haddix
801-1000 QB Eagles
1000 + Legend
#4
yo136
-
- Members
-
- 2,351 posts
Moderator
Posted 09 December 2002 - 07:21 AM
Actually, the players should change every 20 or 50 posts. Something like this:
0-20 Scott Mitchell
20-40 Rich Gannon
40-60 Andre Watters
...
940-960 LT
960-980 Bo Jackson
980-1000 Jerry Rice
1000+ QB Eagles
Netjak.com, your source for great video game reviews.
#5
J-Diddy
-
- Members
-
- 5,250 posts
Tecmo Fanatic
Posted 09 December 2002 - 09:07 PM
That is a fantastic idea.
But Grogan would be 0-20.
#6
Knobbe
-
- Founder
-
- 13,263 posts
Godfather of Tecmo
- Blog Entries: 13
Posted 09 December 2002 - 09:44 PM
I think I'll just keep it as is otherwise people will just post to get ranks
2013 Nebraska: Final 4
2012 TomzcakV: Round of 32
2012 Madison: Round of 32
2012 Nebraska: Round of 16
2011 Nebraska: Final 4
2011 Madison: Round of 32
2010 Chicago: Round of 32
2010 Madison: Round of 32
#7
Slig
-
- Members
-
- 1,798 posts
Tecmo Legend
Posted 10 December 2002 - 03:28 AM
yes, although rankings are cool...the negative externalities that result just don't outweigh the good. There is nothing I hate worse than spam. Fortunately, people on this message board have been extremely good about that thus far.
#8
yo136
-
- Members
-
- 2,351 posts
Moderator
Posted 10 December 2002 - 07:16 AM
yes, although rankings are cool...the negative externalities that result just don't outweigh the good. There is nothing I hate worse than spam. Fortunately, people on this message board have been extremely good about that thus far.
I'm assuming that when you mean "people", I'm not included. Especially with my wiseguy Hokie-like one line responses.
Netjak.com, your source for great video game reviews.
#9
yo136
-
- Members
-
- 2,351 posts
Moderator
Posted 14 January 2003 - 01:23 PM
I think I'll just keep it as is otherwise people will just post to get ranks
Actually, couldn't you just add in special player rankings after someone gets more than 1000 or 2000 posts? That way someone won't just come on the board and start spamming.
Netjak.com, your source for great video game reviews.
#10
Knobbe
-
- Founder
-
- 13,263 posts
Godfather of Tecmo
- Blog Entries: 13
Posted 14 January 2003 - 01:55 PM
Tecmo Legend is the magical top of the ladder as far as ranking title goes. (1000 posts) It doesn't really seem like people are posting just for the sake of obtaining arbitrary titles.
I supposed I'd consider letting people choose something other than Tecmo Legend after a while once this board is old enough to have such a poster. Also, since I can assign any title to anyone I could at any time give someone the 0 dot title of "Tecmo Spammer"
Either way I won't let it keep me up at night.
2013 Nebraska: Final 4
2012 TomzcakV: Round of 32
2012 Madison: Round of 32
2012 Nebraska: Round of 16
2011 Nebraska: Final 4
2011 Madison: Round of 32
2010 Chicago: Round of 32
2010 Madison: Round of 32
|
You are seeing more ads on this site because you aren't logged in/have an account. |
